Following the initial feedback of LTIPP Council, Tradao would like to re-submit its LTIPP application.
The full proposal can be found here:
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884
The council feedback could be summarized as:
Wintermute: Criticized the large grant request, unverifiable metrics, and lack of anti-sybil measures
GMX: Lack of product-market fit and transaction numbers. Found the grant request to be inefficient and the incentive strategies unproven.
GFX: Highlighted concerns about the large grant size and the challenge in verifying Tradao's metrics. Recommended revising the application with enhanced sybil protection measures and to consider feedback from multiple reviewers for a future submission.
As Tradao's permissionless copy trading function launched in early March before the LTIPP application program deadline, the metric of copy trading cannot fully reflect our product-market fit. Here is some update about our metric.
Previous
New
Source:
In response to feedback from the Council and recent dencun upgrade, we propose resubmitting the application with a reduced grant amount by removing the rebates of GMX's excution fee, eliminating trading competition and wallet generation incentive.
Setting the new grant request at 100K ARB, we will implement the following incentive scheme:
Initial unlock 33% of ARB
Milestone 1: 84m Trading Volume (66% of ARB unlocked & 33% of ARB distributed)
Milestone 2: 168m Trading Volume (100% of ARB unlocked & 66% of ARB Distributed)
Milestone 3: 252m Trading Volume (100% of ARB unlocked & 100% of ARB Distributed)
The Tradao team agrees to return to the Arbitrum DAO any unused ARB funds once the 12-week LTIPP program is concluded.
Following the initial feedback of LTIPP Council, Tradao would like to re-submit its LTIPP application.
The full proposal can be found here:
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884
The council feedback could be summarized as:
Wintermute: Criticized the large grant request, unverifiable metrics, and lack of anti-sybil measures
GMX: Lack of product-market fit and transaction numbers. Found the grant request to be inefficient and the incentive strategies unproven.
GFX: Highlighted concerns about the large grant size and the challenge in verifying Tradao's metrics. Recommended revising the application with enhanced sybil protection measures and to consider feedback from multiple reviewers for a future submission.
As Tradao's permissionless copy trading function launched in early March before the LTIPP application program deadline, the metric of copy trading cannot fully reflect our product-market fit. Here is some update about our metric.
Previous
New
Source:
In response to feedback from the Council and recent dencun upgrade, we propose resubmitting the application with a reduced grant amount by removing the rebates of GMX's excution fee, eliminating trading competition and wallet generation incentive.
Setting the new grant request at 100K ARB, we will implement the following incentive scheme:
Initial unlock 33% of ARB
Milestone 1: 84m Trading Volume (66% of ARB unlocked & 33% of ARB distributed)
Milestone 2: 168m Trading Volume (100% of ARB unlocked & 66% of ARB Distributed)
Milestone 3: 252m Trading Volume (100% of ARB unlocked & 100% of ARB Distributed)
The Tradao team agrees to return to the Arbitrum DAO any unused ARB funds once the 12-week LTIPP program is concluded.
New product, need more verifiable data
New product, need more verifiable data
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/clarified-process-for-non-council-recommended-applications-to-move-to-snapshot/23257/3
Share some of the concerns from here https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/11?u=maxlomu
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/12?u=itublockchain
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/11?u=cattin
Based on the work that the council and LTIPP team have done, I trust their judgment and abstain from this vote.
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/9?u=mcfly
I didn't know about the proposal before, but after a closer chat, I found that the team's creativity and the product they are going to make
As an LTIPP advisor, abstaining on all proposals belonging to this second round
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/clarified-process-for-non-council-recommended-applications-to-move-to-snapshot/23257/3
Share some of the concerns from here https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/11?u=maxlomu
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/12?u=itublockchain
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/11?u=cattin
Based on the work that the council and LTIPP team have done, I trust their judgment and abstain from this vote.
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/tradao-ltipp-application-final/21884/9?u=mcfly
I didn't know about the proposal before, but after a closer chat, I found that the team's creativity and the product they are going to make
As an LTIPP advisor, abstaining on all proposals belonging to this second round