Following the initial feedback of LTIPP Council, CVI would like to re-submit its LTIPP application. The full proposal can be found here: https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947
Request: 125,000 $ARB (Reduced from 250,000 $ARB)
CVI.Finance has revised their LTIPP grant proposal based on comprehensive feedback from the Arbitrum Council. In their commitment to align with Arbitrum's expectations and ecosystem, they significantly reduced their initial grant request by 50% and refined their strategic objectives to enhance trading excellence, market stability, and widespread engagement within the ecosystem.
Grant Size Reduction: From 250,000 $ARB to 125,000 $ARB to address council concerns about the original grant size and ensure responsible allocation of resources.
Focused Objectives:
CVI’s revised proposal aligns closely with Arbitrum’s goals for growth and innovation. By scaling down the request and focusing on key performance metrics, CVI is committed to demonstrating the value and effectiveness of the project within the ecosystem.
Following the initial feedback of LTIPP Council, CVI would like to re-submit its LTIPP application. The full proposal can be found here: https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947
Request: 125,000 $ARB (Reduced from 250,000 $ARB)
CVI.Finance has revised their LTIPP grant proposal based on comprehensive feedback from the Arbitrum Council. In their commitment to align with Arbitrum's expectations and ecosystem, they significantly reduced their initial grant request by 50% and refined their strategic objectives to enhance trading excellence, market stability, and widespread engagement within the ecosystem.
Grant Size Reduction: From 250,000 $ARB to 125,000 $ARB to address council concerns about the original grant size and ensure responsible allocation of resources.
Focused Objectives:
CVI’s revised proposal aligns closely with Arbitrum’s goals for growth and innovation. By scaling down the request and focusing on key performance metrics, CVI is committed to demonstrating the value and effectiveness of the project within the ecosystem.
Interesting product, but still a very high request compared to TVL (~17% of Arb TVL). Would be in favor of a smaller grant
85% of the TVL is in 3 wallets, with one holding 50%.... its a bad look, I like the novelty of CVI tho & think it could get PMF
Interesting product, but still a very high request compared to TVL (~17% of Arb TVL). Would be in favor of a smaller grant
85% of the TVL is in 3 wallets, with one holding 50%.... its a bad look, I like the novelty of CVI tho & think it could get PMF
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/clarified-process-for-non-council-recommended-applications-to-move-to-snapshot/23257/3
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947/24?u=itublockchain
Based on the work that the council and LTIPP team have done, I trust their judgment and abstain from this vote.
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947/22?u=mcfly
As an LTIPP advisor, abstaining on all proposals belonging to this second round
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/clarified-process-for-non-council-recommended-applications-to-move-to-snapshot/23257/3
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947/24?u=itublockchain
Based on the work that the council and LTIPP team have done, I trust their judgment and abstain from this vote.
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/cvi-ltipp-application-final/21947/22?u=mcfly
As an LTIPP advisor, abstaining on all proposals belonging to this second round
