This proposal seeks approval to automate the Timeboost proceeds split on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova, and distribute accrued rewards to the Arbitrum Developer Guild (ADG) via a constitutional vote, as per the already-passed and executed proposal to adopt Timeboost. Currently, all Timeboost bid proceeds are sent to the Arbitrum DAO treasury; the portion of Timeboost proceeds allocated to the ADG (3%) must also be sent via an onchain action. This process can be automated by introducing a fee splitter that forwards funds proportionally to the DAO Treasury and to the ADG address that is controlled by the Arbitrum Foundation (AF).
The ADG was established to recognize and support long-term contributors whose work would strengthen the Arbitrum technology, tooling, and infrastructure. For a more detailed update on the ADG, see page 27 in the AF’s 2025 Transparency Report.
Timeboost was activated on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova in April 2025, introducing a new transaction ordering policy to capture some amount of MEV onchain (as opposed to having it leak offchain). As outlined in the Timeboost proposal, proceeds from the auction will be split between the DAO Treasury (97%) and the ADG (3%). In the initial implementation of Timeboost on both networks, 100% of proceeds are directed to the DAO Treasury. Periodically, 3% of these proceeds must be transferred to the ADG per the ratified proposal. This process must be repeated indefinitely (if left unaddressed), and requires a 30+ day process via an onchain vote each time this exercise is carried out.
Automating this fee split onchain is relatively straightforward. If implemented, this automated fee split will eliminate the periodic distribution process required of the DAO and also enable the ADG to receive Timeboost proceeds in a more timely manner. This can be accomplished with an adapted, audited version of the fee router contracts that the DAO relies upon today to collect and claim transaction proceeds for both networks.
This proposal seeks to enable this onchain automation and also distribute the 3% of Timeboost proceeds for the ADG and have accrued to the DAO Treasury thus far. As of May 11, 2026, Timeboost proceeds are 2,517.46 WETH; that translates to 75.52 WETH to be transferred to the ADG, or 3% of total proceeds. The exact amount of WETH to distribute will be determined at a later date when the onchain payload is prepared and date of onchain execution can be estimated more precisely.
Timeboost: The new transaction ordering policy enabled on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova that generates auction proceeds and forwards proceeds to the DAO Treasury; read the documentation here
DAO Treasury: The DAO-controlled addresses that currently receive 100% of Timeboost proceeds; you can find the treasury timelock address for Arbitrum One here and the fee router address on Arbitrum Nova here
Arbitrum Developer Guild (ADG): An initiative to incentivize and grow the set of core developers building Arbitrum technology; the ADG shall receive 3% of Timeboost proceeds per the ratified proposal
RewardDistributor: The smart contract that will be enable an onchain fee split between the DAO Treasury (97%) and the ADG (3%)
Reward Distributor Deployment: A RewardDistributor contract will be deployed with the following parameters on Arbitrum One and on Arbitrum Nova.
Recipients (and distribution weighting):
Reward Distributor Activation: the DAO Upgrade Executors will call the ExpressLaneAuction contracts and update the beneficiary addresses to the newly deployed RewardDistributor contracts on the respective chains.
Accrued Proceeds Distribution: 3% of Timeboost proceeds that have accrued to the DAO treasury (0xbFc1FECa8B09A5c5D3EFfE7429eBE24b9c09EF58) up until the time this proposal is executed will be sent to the ADG address (0x6A075E9a02eef6978DD66cB63DE430a8c0C419E9) on Arbitrum One. This distribution action is the final step in the proposal payload and the exact amount will be determined and included at a later date when the onchain payload is prepared.
Updated RewardDistributor contracts with WETH support will be deployed on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. These RewardDistributor contracts will specify and enact fee splits between the DAO Treasury and the ADG.
The Upgrade Executors on each chain will call the setBeneficiary function on the ExpressLaneAuction contracts, passing in the newly deployed RewardDistributor addresses and effectively forwarding future proceeds there.
Any Timeboost proceeds that have accrued to the DAO Treasury up until this point must be manually split between the DAO and the ADG. 3% of the WETH attributed to Timeboost will be transferred from the DAO treasury timelock to the ADG address as part of the proposal payload.
The following dates are tentative and subject to change.
This proposal seeks approval to automate the Timeboost proceeds split on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova, and distribute accrued rewards to the Arbitrum Developer Guild (ADG) via a constitutional vote, as per the already-passed and executed proposal to adopt Timeboost. Currently, all Timeboost bid proceeds are sent to the Arbitrum DAO treasury; the portion of Timeboost proceeds allocated to the ADG (3%) must also be sent via an onchain action. This process can be automated by introducing a fee splitter that forwards funds proportionally to the DAO Treasury and to the ADG address that is controlled by the Arbitrum Foundation (AF).
The ADG was established to recognize and support long-term contributors whose work would strengthen the Arbitrum technology, tooling, and infrastructure. For a more detailed update on the ADG, see page 27 in the AF’s 2025 Transparency Report.
Timeboost was activated on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova in April 2025, introducing a new transaction ordering policy to capture some amount of MEV onchain (as opposed to having it leak offchain). As outlined in the Timeboost proposal, proceeds from the auction will be split between the DAO Treasury (97%) and the ADG (3%). In the initial implementation of Timeboost on both networks, 100% of proceeds are directed to the DAO Treasury. Periodically, 3% of these proceeds must be transferred to the ADG per the ratified proposal. This process must be repeated indefinitely (if left unaddressed), and requires a 30+ day process via an onchain vote each time this exercise is carried out.
Automating this fee split onchain is relatively straightforward. If implemented, this automated fee split will eliminate the periodic distribution process required of the DAO and also enable the ADG to receive Timeboost proceeds in a more timely manner. This can be accomplished with an adapted, audited version of the fee router contracts that the DAO relies upon today to collect and claim transaction proceeds for both networks.
This proposal seeks to enable this onchain automation and also distribute the 3% of Timeboost proceeds for the ADG and have accrued to the DAO Treasury thus far. As of May 11, 2026, Timeboost proceeds are 2,517.46 WETH; that translates to 75.52 WETH to be transferred to the ADG, or 3% of total proceeds. The exact amount of WETH to distribute will be determined at a later date when the onchain payload is prepared and date of onchain execution can be estimated more precisely.
Timeboost: The new transaction ordering policy enabled on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova that generates auction proceeds and forwards proceeds to the DAO Treasury; read the documentation here
DAO Treasury: The DAO-controlled addresses that currently receive 100% of Timeboost proceeds; you can find the treasury timelock address for Arbitrum One here and the fee router address on Arbitrum Nova here
Arbitrum Developer Guild (ADG): An initiative to incentivize and grow the set of core developers building Arbitrum technology; the ADG shall receive 3% of Timeboost proceeds per the ratified proposal
RewardDistributor: The smart contract that will be enable an onchain fee split between the DAO Treasury (97%) and the ADG (3%)
Reward Distributor Deployment: A RewardDistributor contract will be deployed with the following parameters on Arbitrum One and on Arbitrum Nova.
Recipients (and distribution weighting):
Reward Distributor Activation: the DAO Upgrade Executors will call the ExpressLaneAuction contracts and update the beneficiary addresses to the newly deployed RewardDistributor contracts on the respective chains.
Accrued Proceeds Distribution: 3% of Timeboost proceeds that have accrued to the DAO treasury (0xbFc1FECa8B09A5c5D3EFfE7429eBE24b9c09EF58) up until the time this proposal is executed will be sent to the ADG address (0x6A075E9a02eef6978DD66cB63DE430a8c0C419E9) on Arbitrum One. This distribution action is the final step in the proposal payload and the exact amount will be determined and included at a later date when the onchain payload is prepared.
Updated RewardDistributor contracts with WETH support will be deployed on Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova. These RewardDistributor contracts will specify and enact fee splits between the DAO Treasury and the ADG.
The Upgrade Executors on each chain will call the setBeneficiary function on the ExpressLaneAuction contracts, passing in the newly deployed RewardDistributor addresses and effectively forwarding future proceeds there.
Any Timeboost proceeds that have accrued to the DAO Treasury up until this point must be manually split between the DAO and the ADG. 3% of the WETH attributed to Timeboost will be transferred from the DAO treasury timelock to the ADG address as part of the proposal payload.
The following dates are tentative and subject to change.
As MconnectDAO.eth, I view this proposal as a reasonable operationalization of the previously ratified 97/3 Timeboost proceeds split between the DAO Treasury and ADG, reducing recurring governance and execution overhead.
It would be useful to document the exact methodology and data sources used to compute the accrued 3% transfer amount, so that community members can independently verify the figure via dashboards or queries.
Please clarify the control model for the new RewardDistributor contracts (who can change recipients/weights and under which governance process), to avoid any ambiguity around future modifications of the split.
Given this becomes a continuous funding stream for ADG, I'd encourage explicit reporting on Timeboost-derived inflows and a periodic review point so the DAO can evaluate whether the allocation and automation remain aligned with its long-term priorities.
hey @MconnectDAO - Allan from Offchain here!
The RewardDistributor contracts will be owned and controlled by the DAO upon deployment. Updating the recipients or weights in any way will require an onchain proposal.
Please let me know if you have any other questions!
As MconnectDAO.eth, I view this proposal as a reasonable operationalization of the previously ratified 97/3 Timeboost proceeds split between the DAO Treasury and ADG, reducing recurring governance and execution overhead.
It would be useful to document the exact methodology and data sources used to compute the accrued 3% transfer amount, so that community members can independently verify the figure via dashboards or queries.
Please clarify the control model for the new RewardDistributor contracts (who can change recipients/weights and under which governance process), to avoid any ambiguity around future modifications of the split.
Given this becomes a continuous funding stream for ADG, I'd encourage explicit reporting on Timeboost-derived inflows and a periodic review point so the DAO can evaluate whether the allocation and automation remain aligned with its long-term priorities.
hey @MconnectDAO - Allan from Offchain here!
The RewardDistributor contracts will be owned and controlled by the DAO upon deployment. Updating the recipients or weights in any way will require an onchain proposal.
Please let me know if you have any other questions!
Voting FOR. It's fair and straightforward, and it makes the process more automated.
Timeboost has been a great innovation for Arbitrum, counterbalancing tx fees that have been trending toward zero as the technology scales.
With crypto volatility significantly reduced, Timeboost revenue has been obviously trending downward.
Voting FOR. It's fair and straightforward, and it makes the process more automated.
Timeboost has been a great innovation for Arbitrum, counterbalancing tx fees that have been trending toward zero as the technology scales.
With crypto volatility significantly reduced, Timeboost revenue has been obviously trending downward.
But beyond that, the continued shift in volume toward perps and RFQs may represent a more structural challenge. I wonder whether this trend can be reversed, or there is a solution in progress to capture value from this new dynamic.
EDIT: Looks like a change is indeed under way https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-transition-arbitrum-one-ordering-policy-to-priority-gas-auctions-pga/30942
Voting FOR. It's fair and straightforward, and it makes the process more automated.
Timeboost has been a great innovation for Arbitrum, counterbalancing tx fees that have been trending toward zero as the technology scales.
With crypto volatility significantly reduced, Timeboost revenue has been obviously trending downward.
Voting FOR. It's fair and straightforward, and it makes the process more automated.
Timeboost has been a great innovation for Arbitrum, counterbalancing tx fees that have been trending toward zero as the technology scales.
With crypto volatility significantly reduced, Timeboost revenue has been obviously trending downward.
But beyond that, the continued shift in volume toward perps and RFQs may represent a more structural challenge. I wonder whether this trend can be reversed, or there is a solution in progress to capture value from this new dynamic.
EDIT: Looks like a change is indeed under way https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/constitutional-aip-transition-arbitrum-one-ordering-policy-to-priority-gas-auctions-pga/30942
