https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/contrax-ltipp-application-draft/21707
404 DAO Feedback It was clear the Contrax spent a lot of time thinking about their application and execution strategy. We think their UI/UX focused product will bring in new users and like their incentive design that bases the ARB emissions on TVL growth. A small grant ask that we think is properly justified.
Wintermute Feedback Contrax’s application was well written and provided a good amount of justification and calculation of their grant size and execution strategy. Their adoption thus far has been underwhelming, however, their product looks decent.
We like their intended execution strategy that focuses on adoption and retention. Ultimately, the incentives also carry a second-order effect by increasing TVL across other Arbitrum protocols.
While their grant size is greater than their current TVL, we believe that they have a good enough execution strategy and product that focuses on driving users to Arbitrum.
We support this application.
Karel Feedback Vote AGAINST Contrax's proposal.
Decent proposal that scored well on rubric. Like the cross-protocol partnerships they have in-place with other Arbitrum protocols. However, minimal product differentiation (beyond web3auth/social sign-on), has shown minimal adoption/demand for the product in contrast to peers, and requested grant size exceeds their TVL. Risk that incentives and APR boost will not lead to organic, long-term/renteitve usage. Believe they should prove out further traction first and resubmit proposal at a later grants window.
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/contrax-ltipp-application-draft/21707
404 DAO Feedback It was clear the Contrax spent a lot of time thinking about their application and execution strategy. We think their UI/UX focused product will bring in new users and like their incentive design that bases the ARB emissions on TVL growth. A small grant ask that we think is properly justified.
Wintermute Feedback Contrax’s application was well written and provided a good amount of justification and calculation of their grant size and execution strategy. Their adoption thus far has been underwhelming, however, their product looks decent.
We like their intended execution strategy that focuses on adoption and retention. Ultimately, the incentives also carry a second-order effect by increasing TVL across other Arbitrum protocols.
While their grant size is greater than their current TVL, we believe that they have a good enough execution strategy and product that focuses on driving users to Arbitrum.
We support this application.
Karel Feedback Vote AGAINST Contrax's proposal.
Decent proposal that scored well on rubric. Like the cross-protocol partnerships they have in-place with other Arbitrum protocols. However, minimal product differentiation (beyond web3auth/social sign-on), has shown minimal adoption/demand for the product in contrast to peers, and requested grant size exceeds their TVL. Risk that incentives and APR boost will not lead to organic, long-term/renteitve usage. Believe they should prove out further traction first and resubmit proposal at a later grants window.
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/long-term-incentives-pilot-program/20223/60?u=mcfly
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/404-dao-delegate-communication-thread/22494/7?u=404dao
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/long-term-incentives-pilot-program/20223/60?u=mcfly
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/404-dao-delegate-communication-thread/22494/7?u=404dao
Impressed with Contrax's team and their development since their launch in late last year. We look forward to their continued growth.
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/long-term-incentives-pilot-program/20223/59?u=krst
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/contrax-ltipp-application-final/21707/7?u=itublockchain
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral as per the LTIPP proposal
Voting FOR all proposals, recognizing LTIPP's thorough execution and its vital role in driving Arbitrum Ecosystem's growth.
As an advisor, member of LTIPP, voting "for" on ALL published proposals to support both the protocols and the work of the council.
Impressed with Contrax's team and their development since their launch in late last year. We look forward to their continued growth.
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/long-term-incentives-pilot-program/20223/59?u=krst
https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/contrax-ltipp-application-final/21707/7?u=itublockchain
As the Program Manager StableLab will vote Abstain on every LTIPP proposal to remain neutral as per the LTIPP proposal
Voting FOR all proposals, recognizing LTIPP's thorough execution and its vital role in driving Arbitrum Ecosystem's growth.
As an advisor, member of LTIPP, voting "for" on ALL published proposals to support both the protocols and the work of the council.
